Life Course of a Mas Murderer Essay Example for Free

Life Course of a Mas receiver EssayOn April 16, 2007 one of the close devastating mass murders in U.S history occurred at a Virginia college. Seung-Hui Cho a 23 year old S off-keyh Korean alone executed the killing of 33 mountain by securing colleges doors to prevent escape of any students. Events such as these are truly sad and devastating to all involved. By gathering background information about Seung-Hui Cho, we notify effectively assure social development theories as they relate to Cho and review my analysis that this particular occurrence was preventable. Born in South Korea, Seung-Hui Cho immigrated to America when he was 8 years old. Although Cho was a quiet well be need electric razor he was awkwardly withdrawn and angry (cite book). Throughout schooling Cho was teased and bullied which could have been the cause of his total grades throughout school. Chos sister Sun-kyung was often in the school newspaper and was selected to attend the most selected Ivy League U niversities (Schmalleger, 2009). Cho went on to attend Virginia tech where he was recognize once again for world extremely violent and was even removed from class. Cho was referred to multiple counselors and officials where he denied all thoughts of suicide and homicide. Although Cho denied these having these thoughts students that attend Virginia tech could see the imminent risk rising with Cho.There are many social development theories that can be applied to Seung-Hui Cho but I feel that the Life Course Perspective accurately represents Cho most effectively. With the social development perspective, human development occurs on many levels simotaneously, including psychological, biological, familial, interpersonal, cultural, social, and ecological (Schmalleger, 2009). Social development dtheories focus on delinquencies over an extended period of time as well as transitions commonwealth go through within their life span. As the Life course perspective suggests Cho exhibitedshowed a unadorned pattern of anti-social behavior throughout his childishness and had never committed any crimes. Cho had a hard childhood and was in the shadows of his very successful sister. Even in college Cho had no friends and began to look up to other school shooters as martyrs. Although these individuals were not his friends at all in his situation they were the closest thing to having friends. In college Cho was incriminate of stalking women on two different occasions, was caught taking photos of the legs of female students in class and was separated out of classes. I believe that Chos antisocial lifestyle along with the transition any from home in the end lead him to commit the mass murder. Chos anti-social lifestyle seemed to escalate to felonious behaviors from the time he went off to college until the time of the Virginia Tech shooting.I believe that this tragedy could have been prevented if the proper preventative measures and interference techniques were taken. As a bo y Cho should have been taken in for a mental evaluation but I believe the integration of his family into the American society prevented that. In high school Cho be bullied and teased could have been put to a stop by teachers and surrounding students. Also when Cho started writing gruesome poems short stories and plays he should have been recommended to a counselor. Any counselor that Cho had encounters with could have been a lot more persistent in getting to the bottom of Chos situations. A teacher college teacher doesnt just separate a student from her class. Finally the two females who Cho supposedly stalked could have reported Cho and pressed charges, preventing him from escalating in criminal nature.Seung-Hui Cho may have lived a particularly difficult life but with appropriate preventative and treatment measures the Virginia Tech shooting could have been prevented. One way this could have been prevented is with the support of his family. Chos family should have play a larger r ole in providing guidance and discipline and instilling sound values in Cho. Also social institutions failed him. He was bullied in teased in schools and church which could have been the reason for him being anti-social throughout his lifespan (Seung-Hui, 2013). Finally individuals in Chos life should have intervened immediately and constructively when bedraggled behaviorfirst occurred. After closely reviewing Chos background information and examining social development theories as they relate to Cho my analysis is that the Virginia Tech shooting was preventable.ReferencesSchmalleger, F. (2009). Criminology today An integrative introduction. (5th ed., pp. 297-341). Columbus, OH Pearson Prentice Hal. Retrieved from http//devry.vitalsource.com/ Seung-Hui Cho. (2013). The Biography Channel website. Retrieved 0622, Jul 28, 2013, from http//www.biography.com/people/seung-hui-cho-235991.